Therapy In Comprehensive Manner

Traditional medicines, such as acupuncture, homeopathy, aromatherapy, herbalism, and naturopathy, have existed for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. They share many core principles and concepts, however, there are three forces or faults, which are inherent to these practices. The first is a lack of scientific evidence. Traditional medicines, being based on ancient practices, are rarely supported with scientifically-backed studies to validate their efficacy and safety. As the complexity of the human body and its diseases becomes increasingly more understood, traditional medicines are becoming ever harder to justify, however, they remain popular due to their reliance upon anecdotal evidence and personal experience of those who practice them. The second fault is the neglect of conventional medicine. Traditional medicines often overlook the use of evidence-based conventional practices, instead relying upon their own methods. This can lead to serious medical issues, as the cause of a problem may be misdiagnosed or over-simplified. The reliance upon individual experience also makes it difficult to judge the safety and efficacy of particular treatments, leaving individuals open to potentially dangerous consequences. The third fault is the lack of regulation. As traditional medicines are based upon ancient practices, they are not subject to the same rigorous safety and efficacy regulations as conventional medicine. This lack of oversight can leave practitioners open to exploitation, as there are no guarantees of effective treatments or correct diagnostic advice. Overall, traditional medicines remain popular due to their age-old practices and support from practitioners and anecdotal evidence. However, they appear to suffer from a lack of scientific evidence, an inability to integrate with conventional medicine, and a lack of regulatory oversight. For these reasons, it is important to be aware of these faults when considering any traditional medicine.